Standings Gain Points for NFBC Leagues

In the post that follows, I’ll share standings gain points (SGP) factors for the NFBC Main Event, NFBC Draft Championship, and NFBC Online Championship for each of the last five years (2012-2016). But I’ve got to lay some groundwork before we get there…

Raw vs. Relative

While the discussion is a bit lengthy, I think this article discussing “raw” and “relative” SGP contains one of the most significant realizations I’ve had in fantasy baseball.

The quick and dirty explanation of this realization is that it is not only the raw SGP factors (or denominators) that drive player value calculations. The relationship, or relative value, between the SGP factors is also meaningful. Not only that, but looking exclusively at raw factors can be misleading, as it is difficult to see these relationships.

To illustrate, here are two example sets of raw SGP factors for a league:

League BA R HR RBI SB
2013 15-team NFBC Main Event 0.00161 13.751 5.533 15.115 6.228
2016 15-team NFBC Main Event 0.00150 15.366 6.561 16.838 6.375

I refer to these as raw factors because they’re calculated using the standard process prescribed by SGP. A calculation is made for each scoring category and those numbers are then fed into the process that’s used to rank or assign dollar values to players.

Looking again at the table of raw data above, you might think, “Wow, what happened in the last three years that caused those significant changes in the SGP factors?”

You might even start spewing some narrative about the changing landscape of baseball, the rise in strikeouts, and the power surge MLB experienced last season.

But before you start that process, let’s take a look at those same sets of SGP factors, after they’ve been converted into relative form:

League BA R HR RBI SB
2013 15-team NFBC Main Event 0.00011 0.90976 0.36609 1.00000 0.41202
2016 15-team NFBC Main Event 0.00009 0.91256 0.38963 1.00000 0.37862

The numbers still fluctuate. And if you run the math, from 2013 to 2016 the categories changed about 10%, on average, in both the raw and relative calculations. But seeing the factors in relative form really gives me a lot more confidence in my calculations.

I was always wondering if I screwed up my calculations before making this realization. “Could RBI really have changed that much?”

To be clear, I did not develop this way of looking at the numbers. I made the realization after reading “Winning Fantasy Baseball” by Larry Schechter. Although I didn’t invent this approach, I continue to share it because I think a lot of folks are confused by the raw numbers and this confusion leads to decreased confidence in the SGP approach.

How to Calculate Relative SGP


I’d encourage you to read the lengthier discussion, but the relative calculation for a given category is just the raw number divided by the category with the largest raw factor. This is usually RBI for hitting categories and strikeouts for pitching.

For example:

13.751 / 15.115 = 0.90976.

Where 13.751 is the raw 2013 runs factor and 15.115 is the raw RBI factor.

Now for the NFBC Data

Using the approach outlined here, I downloaded the overall standings and individual category statistics from the NFBC’s public standings information. I did this for the Main Event, Online Championship, and Draft Championship for the five years from 2012 to 2016.

I then took the data and calculated the average stats required to finish in each place within the standings. Those average stats were then used to calculate the SGP denominators for each of the past five seasons for each of the three league types.

NFBC Draft Championship SGP Factors

Click here to download the 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, or 2016 data files.

Here are the Draft Championship hitting categories:

Year Type BA R HR RBI SB
2012 Raw 0.00170 16.782 7.663 19.447 7.211
2013 Raw 0.00161 16.643 6.356 17.999 6.911
2014 Raw 0.00168 16.301 6.146 17.332 6.725
2015 Raw 0.00152 17.255 6.841 17.328 6.193
2016 Raw 0.00157 17.848 7.626 19.274 6.716
2012 Relative 0.00009 0.86297 0.39404 1.000 0.37079
2013 Relative 0.00009 0.92466 0.35311 1.000 0.38398
2014 Relative 0.00010 0.94053 0.35461 1.000 0.38803
2015 Relative 0.00009 0.99579 0.39479 1.000 0.35742
2016 Relative 0.00008 0.92601 0.39568 1.000 0.34848

Here are the Draft Championship pitching categories:

Year Type ERA WHIP W K SV
2012 Raw (0.06280) (0.01080) 2.903 29.463 6.791
2013 Raw (0.06194) (0.01157) 2.872 31.221 6.730
2014 Raw (0.05829) (0.01052) 2.947 31.746 6.685
2015 Raw (0.06372) (0.01189) 2.666 31.950 6.598
2016 Raw (0.06815) (0.01326) 2.950 30.612 6.376
2012 Relative (0.00213) (0.0037) 0.09852 1.000 0.23048
2013 Relative (0.00198) (0.0037) 0.09198 1.000 0.21555
2014 Relative (0.00184) (0.0033) 0.09284 1.000 0.21057
2015 Relative (0.00199) (0.0037) 0.08346 1.000 0.20653
2016 Relative (0.00223) (0.0043) 0.09637 1.000 0.20828

NFBC Online Championship SGP Factors

Click here to download the 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, or 2016 data files.

Here are the Online Championship hitting categories:

Year Type BA R HR RBI SB
2012 Raw 0.00220 19.197 8.016 20.675 8.270
2013 Raw 0.00193 19.265 7.537 20.685 8.603
2014 Raw 0.00197 18.843 7.481 19.639 7.900
2015 Raw 0.00177 19.920 8.429 19.549 7.591
2016 Raw 0.00182 19.721 8.797 21.527 8.508
2012 Relative 0.00011 0.92848 0.38769 1.000 0.40001
2013 Relative 0.00009 0.93136 0.36435 1.000 0.41589
2014 Relative 0.00010 0.95950 0.38094 1.000 0.40224
2015 Relative 0.00009 1.01898 0.43115 1.000 0.38828
2016 Relative 0.00008 0.91607 0.40863 1.000 0.39520

Here are the Online Championship pitching categories:

Year Type ERA WHIP W K SV
2012 Raw (0.07840) (0.01320) 3.253 30.968 7.184
2013 Raw (0.07623) (0.01472) 2.899 32.811 7.038
2014 Raw (0.06880) (0.01280) 2.999 31.181 6.964
2015 Raw (0.07876) (0.01464) 2.926 35.163 7.210
2016 Raw (0.08042) (0.01529) 3.184 34.212 6.842
2012 Relative (0.00253) (0.00043) 0.10503 1.000 0.23197
2013 Relative (0.00232) (0.00045) 0.08837 1.000 0.21452
2014 Relative (0.00214) (0.00040) 0.09320 1.000 0.21640
2015 Relative (0.00224) (0.00042) 0.08321 1.000 0.20505
2016 Relative (0.00235) (0.00045) 0.09307 1.000 0.19998

NFBC Main Event SGP Factors

Click here to download the 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, or 2016 data files.

Here are the Main Event hitting categories:

Year Type BA R HR RBI SB
2012 Raw 0.00171 15.169 6.103 15.636 6.153
2013 Raw 0.00161 13.751 5.533 15.115 6.228
2014 Raw 0.00155 14.765 6.157 16.100 5.563
2015 Raw 0.00142 15.188 6.341 15.043 5.710
2016 Raw 0.00150 15.366 6.561 16.838 6.375
2012 Relative 0.00011 0.97014 0.39029 1.000 0.39349
2013 Relative 0.00011 0.90976 0.36609 1.000 0.41202
2014 Relative 0.00010 0.91704 0.38243 1.000 0.34554
2015 Relative 0.00009 1.00960 0.42151 1.000 0.37958
2016 Relative 0.00009 0.91256 0.38963 1.000 0.37862

Here are the Main Event pitching categories:

Year Type ERA WHIP W K SV
2012 Raw (0.05822) (0.01024) 2.431 22.484 5.232
2013 Raw (0.06295) (0.01110) 2.445 24.344 5.304
2014 Raw (0.05709) (0.01022) 2.387 23.707 5.491
2015 Raw (0.06218) (0.01066) 2.379 25.024 5.416
2016 Raw (0.06714) (0.01251) 2.325 22.817 5.316
2012 Relative (0.00259) (0.00046) 0.10811 1.000 0.23267
2013 Relative (0.00259) (0.00046) 0.10044 1.000 0.21786
2014 Relative (0.00241) (0.00043) 0.10068 1.000 0.23160
2015 Relative (0.00248) (0.00043) 0.09508 1.000 0.21644
2016 Relative (0.00294) (0.00055) 0.10189 1.000 0.23299

Averages of the Last Five Seasons

Here are the hitting categories:

Year Type BA R HR RBI SB
2012-2016 Draft Championship Raw 0.00162 16.96584 6.92636 18.27598 6.75148
2012-2016 Online Championship Raw 0.00194 19.38923 8.05178 20.41514 8.17420
2012-2016 Main Event Raw 0.00156 14.84767 6.13897 15.74659 6.00580
2012-2016 Draft Championship Relative 0.00009 0.92999 0.37845 1.00000 0.36974
2012-2016 Online Championship Relative 0.00010 0.95088 0.39455 1.00000 0.40033
2012-2016 Main Event Relative 0.00010 0.94382 0.3899 1.00000 0.38185

Here are the pitching categories:

Year Type ERA WHIP W K SV
2012-2016 Draft Championship Raw (0.06298) (0.01161) 2.86769 30.99836 6.63583
2012-2016 Online Championship Raw (0.07652) (0.01413) 3.05221 33.06689 7.04756
2012-2016 Main Event Raw (0.06152) (0.01095) 2.39339 23.67533 5.35163
2012-2016 Draft Championship Relative (0.00203) (0.00037) 0.09264 1.00000 0.21428
2012-2016 Online Championship Relative (0.00232) (0.00043) 0.09257 1.00000 0.21358
2012-2016 Main Event Relative (0.00260) (0.00046) 0.10124 1.00000 0.22631

The Takeaway

Besides sharing the summarized NFBC standings data, I really hope that by seeing and beginning to use relative SGP factors, you can feel more confident about your SGP calculations and avoid wondering about questions like…


  • My SGP denominators differ significantly from the ones you have on your site, did I do something wrong?

  • I’m in a new 13-team league with no history. Can I use SGP? Can I use the SGP factors for a similar 12-team league?

  • I play in a highly competitive league? Does that mean my SGP factors should be different than my non-competitive league?

You can see from the numbers above that seemingly different SGP factors look a lot more similar when converted to the relative scale. You can also see that the factors from a 12-team league are not all that different from a 15-team league. And similarly, an ultra-high stakes league can be comparable to that of a lower-level buy-in.

If you’re interested in learning more about SGP or other in-depth fantasy baseball topics, please be sure to follow me on Twitter.

Stay smart.

6 thoughts on “Standings Gain Points for NFBC Leagues”

  1. Interesting article. I participate in an AL Only league and the relative SGP’s from 2013-2016 are as follows:

    BA: 0.00006 R: 0.942 HR: 0.314 RBI: 1.000 SB: 0.205

    ERA: (0.0021) WHIP: (0.0004) W: 0.078 K: 1.000 SV: 0.167

    So it looks like my AL Only league is fairly similar to the NFBC Draft Championship numbers.

  2. Yes it does compare very closely and BTW, our AL league is hosted by OnRoto ironically enough (Tout Wars also uses OnRoto)

  3. I don’t have a lot of time to do the SGP work on my standard Yahoo! leagues. Do you think using the Raw SGP numbers from above is an acceptable replacement for figuring out value?

    1. Yes, I think you’ll still come out in a similar spot. I analyzed a wider breadth of league types in this article, and I found that the relative numbers for a lot of different leagues appear to be very similar.

Comments are closed.