Going through the process of projecting individual players is one of my favorite parts of the year. I started creating my own projections two seasons ago, using Mike Podhorzer’s book Projecting X.
There are parts of the projection process I feel very comfortable with. I can look at a player’s recent plate discipline, batted ball mix, and power ratios to arrive at an accurate projection for most of that player’s stat line…
But when it comes to projecting playing time, I feel like I’m throwing darts with a blindfold on. How can I realistically make a determination between 675 PAs and 690 PAs?
Until now, I’ve really just relied upon a player’s recent seasons and used qualitative information about injuries, role on the team, and playing time competitions to come up with an estimate for total plate appearances.
Thankfully, a reader of the site recently commented on a post I wrote about the effect of batting order on runs and RBI, and his question helped me arrive at the much more sound approach for projecting playing time I’m about to share with you. Here’s his question:
Interesting stuff. In your research, I am wondering if you happened to look at Team Runs/Plate Appearances on a per game basis?
That is, if a team scores Y runs in a game, what would you predict their Team PAs to be. Something like Y = Ax + B.
~DMM
That question got the wheels turning in my rapidly deteriorating middle-aged brain… There have to be better ways to think about playing time. And I certainly need to take the team’s overall run scoring into account.
Then I created a scatter plot in Excel by graphing team runs against team plate appearances.
I’ve mentioned it many times on the site already. I’m no statistician. I don’t play one on TV. And I’m not pretending to be one on the internet. I am squarely in the area of having enough knowledge about statistics to offer no help but to only be dangerous. With that amazing qualifier I’ll try to explain what you see in that chart above.
Each of the blue dots represents one team’s season in the last 10 years (2006-2015). For example, the dot in the top right corner is the 2007 Yankees, who scored 968 runs (holy crap, A-ROD!).
The dotted red line represents a trend line or line of best fit. It’s the best estimate of the relationship between team runs scored and team plate appearances. The equation on the graph is the formula used to chart out the red line and is the exact answer to reader DMM’s question (where x is team runs scored and y is team plate appearances).
y=1.141x+5375.6
I suppose that could be helpful at the daily game level too. That equation would become y=0.007x+33.18 if you were trying to project a team’s plate appearances in an individual game (where x is runs per game, not season-long runs).
Projecting Individual Plate Appearances
That answers the original question. But I still wasn’t quite satisfied with stopping there.
Sure, it’s helpful to know that if I think Angels will score 700 runs that I should project that whole team for about 6,175 plate appearances (5,375.6 + 1.141 * 700 = 6,174.3). But what does that mean to Mike Trout if I think he will bat second in the lineup? And what if I think he’ll bat third?
Is there a way to add a third variable to the chart above? So we can see how leadoff hitters on teams scoring 700 runs have fared? Or how cleanup hitters on teams scoring 800 runs have performed?
The Data
Baseball-Reference has a really interesting split table that shows the hitting stats each team had from each spot in the lineup (click here to see Kansas City’s 2015 team split).
I downloaded that split table for all 30 teams for each of the last 10 seasons (300 CSV files!). You can see all the raw data here. Again, thanks to Baseball-Reference for making this data available.
Then I grouped the data by team runs scored, putting teams into categories of 500-549, 550-599, 600-649, 650-699, 700-749, 750-799, 800-849, 850-899, 900-949, and 950-999 runs. Here’s a table showing the number of teams in each of these categories for the AL and NL:
“The Process”, My Latest Book, with Jeff Zimmerman
The 2024 edition of The Process, by Jeff Zimmerman and Tanner Bell, is now available! Click here to read what folks like John Pausma, Phil Dussault, Eno Sarris, Clay Link, Rob Silver, Rudy Gamble, and others have to say about the book.
The Process is your one-stop resource for better drafting, in-season management, and developing strategies to become a better manager. The book is loaded with unique studies, tips, and strategies you won't find anywhere else. Click here for more details.